SYNERGIZING SEMANTIC ROLE LABELING: A HYBRID APPROACH TO TEXT SUMMARIZATION

Authors

  • L. Anong Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Dusit Rajabhat University, Dusit, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Text summarization, semantic role labeling, hybrid approach

Abstract

Text summarization plays a crucial role in distilling essential information from large volumes of text. In this study, we propose a hybrid approach to text summarization that synergizes semantic role labeling (SRL) techniques. By integrating SRL, which identifies the roles of words and phrases in a sentence, with traditional text summarization methods, we aim to enhance the quality and coherence of generated summaries. Our approach leverages the rich semantic information provided by SRL to extract salient content and improve the overall effectiveness of the summarization process. Through experimental evaluation and comparison with existing methods, we demonstrate the efficacy of our hybrid approach in generating concise and informative summaries across various text genres and domains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barzilay, R. and M. Elhadad, 1997. Using lexical chains for text summarization. Proceedings of the Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization Workshop, August 1997, ACL, Madrid, Spain, pp: 10-17.

Dao, T. and T. Simpson, 2005. Measuring similarity between sentences. Proceedings of the Document Understanding Conference 2002.

Edmundson, H.P., 1969. New methods in automatic extracting. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery, 16: 264-285.

Fattah, M.A. and F. Ren, 2009. GA, MR, FFNN, PNN and GMM based models for automatic text summarization. Comput. Speech Language, 23: 126-144.

Gong, Y. and X. Liu, 2001. Generic text summarization using relevance measure and latent semantic analysis. Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, September 9-12, 2001, New Orleans, LA., USA., pp: 9-25.

Ko, Y. and J. Seo, 2008. An effective sentence-extraction technique using contextual information and statistical approaches for text summarization. Pattern Recognition Lett. Arch., 29: 1366-1371.

Kupiec, J., J. Pedersen and F. Chen, 1995. A trainable document summarizer. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 9-13, 1995, New York, USA., pp: 68-73.

Lin, C., 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out, July 25-26, 2004, Barcelona, Spain, pp: 74-81.

Luhn, H.P., 1958. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM J. Res. Dev., 2: 159-165.

Mani, I. and M.T. Maybury, 1999. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge.

Morris, G., G.M. Kasper and D.A. Adam, 1992. The effect and limitation of automated text condensing on reading comprehension performance. Inform. Syst. Res., 3: 17-35.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-05

How to Cite

L. Anong. (2016). SYNERGIZING SEMANTIC ROLE LABELING: A HYBRID APPROACH TO TEXT SUMMARIZATION. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 6(01), 01–06. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/100