UNVEILING INFLUENTIAL FACTORS IN TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING LANDSCAPES
Keywords:
Technology-enhanced learning, influential factors, educational technologyAbstract
This study delves into the complex terrain of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) by unveiling the influential factors that shape its landscape. TEL, encompassing various digital tools and platforms, has transformed educational practices and pedagogies. Through an interdisciplinary lens, this research examines the multifaceted factors influencing the adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of TEL initiatives. Key considerations include technological infrastructure, pedagogical approaches, learner characteristics, institutional culture, policy frameworks, and socio-economic contexts. Drawing on empirical research, theoretical frameworks, and case studies, this study provides insights into the dynamic interactions among these factors and their impact on TEL outcomes. Understanding these influential factors is crucial for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders seeking to optimize the design, implementation, and evaluation of TEL interventions.
Downloads
References
Acevedo, M. and Krueger, J.I. (2004), “Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: the voter’s illusion and the belief in personal relevance”, Political Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 115-134.
Alsabawy, A.Y., Cater-Steel, A. and Soar, J. (2016), “Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 64, November, pp. 843-858.
Bateman, S., Brooks, C., McCalla, G. and Brusilovsky, P. (2007), Applying Collaborative Tagging to E-Learning, Banff, Alberta.
Bekebrede, G., Warmelink, H. and Mayer, I.S. (2011), “Reviewing the need for gaming in education to accommodate the net generation”, Computers & Education, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 1521-1529.
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H. and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company, New York, NY.
Branch, R.M. and Merrill, M.D. (2012), “Chapter 2: characteristics of instructional design models”, in Reiser, R.A. (Ed.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 3rd ed., international ed., Pearson, Boston, MA., pp. 8-16.
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
Bates, A. W., & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2013). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Lai, K. W., & Hong, K. S. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics in technology-enhanced problem-based learning: A case study of different gender groups. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(1), 97-115.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dieter Fischer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.
