AGE-APPROPRIATE METHODS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING: ADAPTING STRATEGIES FOR SCHOOLCHILDREN AND UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Keywords:
Age-appropriate methods, English Language Teaching (ELT), schoolchildren, university students, cognitive development, affective factors, motivation, pedagogical strategies, task-based learning, communicative language teaching.Abstract
Effective English Language Teaching (ELT) is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor; pedagogical strategies must be carefully adapted to the unique cognitive, affective, and social characteristics of different age groups. This article explores the critical importance of employing age-appropriate methods in ELT, specifically contrasting approaches for schoolchildren (primary and secondary levels) and university students. It delves into how developmental differences in cognitive abilities, attention spans, learning styles, motivational drivers, and social needs necessitate distinct instructional strategies. For schoolchildren, methods emphasizing play, sensory engagement, routine, and positive reinforcement are often most effective, while university students benefit from approaches that foster autonomy, critical thinking, complex problem-solving, and professional relevance. The article outlines theoretical underpinnings for age-specific pedagogy, provides concrete examples of adapted strategies, and discusses challenges in implementation. Ultimately, tailoring ELT methods to the developmental stage of learners not only enhances language acquisition and retention but also significantly boosts engagement, motivation, and the overall effectiveness of the learning process.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press.
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Saydamatova, N. S. (2025). DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH ENGLISH READING ACTIVITIES. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 12(02).
Saydamatova, N. S. (2025). THE IMPACT OF GAMIFICATION ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 12(02).
Saydamatova, N. S. (2024). MASTERING ENTREPRENEURIAL TERMINOLOGY: A FIVE-STAGE GUIDE FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, 5(2), 383–386.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.