ASSESSING LANGUAGE AND CONTENT PROGRESS IN CLIL CLASSROOMS: FORMATIVE VS. SUMMATIVE APPROACHES

Authors

  • Diana Kaziyeva

Keywords:

CLIL, formative assessment, summative assessment, language development, content learning, student progress, assessment strategies, bilingual education.

Abstract

This article explores the assessment of language and content learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms, focusing on the comparison between formative and summative assessment approaches. CLIL pedagogy emphasizes the simultaneous development of language proficiency and subject knowledge, making assessment a crucial component for monitoring student progress. Formative assessment, conducted during the learning process, provides ongoing feedback that guides both teachers and students, encouraging reflection and adaptation of instructional strategies. Summative assessment, on the other hand, evaluates learning outcomes at the end of a unit or course, offering a comprehensive measure of achievement. The findings underline the importance of integrating formative and summative assessment strategically to create a supportive and motivating learning environment. Educators are encouraged to employ varied assessment tools, such as portfolios, peer assessment, quizzes, and project-based evaluations, to capture a holistic picture of student progress in both language and content domains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. London: King’s College London.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204.

Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2015). CLIL: Disentangling the Relationship between Language Learning and Content Learning. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 1–16.

Fernández, E., & García, M. (2018). Formative Assessment in CLIL Classrooms: Tools and Practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(6), 671–688.

Coyle, D. (2013). Supporting Quality Teaching in CLIL Classrooms: Assessment and Pedagogy. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–12.

Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Language Learning in CLIL and Traditional EFL Settings: Are There Differences? The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 3, 41–56.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-21

How to Cite

Diana Kaziyeva. (2025). ASSESSING LANGUAGE AND CONTENT PROGRESS IN CLIL CLASSROOMS: FORMATIVE VS. SUMMATIVE APPROACHES. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 15(09), 636–640. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/1852