APPLYING MOTIVATIONAL METHODS TO STUDENTS IN TEACHING THE SCIENCE OF AUTOMATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES
Keywords:
Motivation in education; automation of technological processes; teaching methods; student engagement; problem-based learning; gamification; engineering education; technological integration; applied motivation; professional competencies.Abstract
This research focuses on the application of motivational methods in teaching the science of automation of technological processes, a field that requires a combination of theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Motivation plays a crucial role in enhancing students’ interest, engagement, and effectiveness in mastering complex concepts related to automation systems, control mechanisms, and technological integration. The study examines various motivational strategies, including goal-oriented learning, problem-based tasks, gamification techniques, and real-world project applications. By implementing these methods, students are encouraged to develop creative thinking, analytical problem-solving abilities, and professional competencies. The research emphasizes that motivational approaches not only increase academic achievement but also prepare students for their future careers in engineering and technology. The findings suggest that a well-structured motivational system contributes significantly to improving the quality of education in the field of automation of technological processes.
Downloads
References
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034.
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active Learning: An Introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 1–5.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. Springer.
Wlodkowski, R. J., & Ginsberg, M. B. (2017). Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(4), 85–118.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2014). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (4th ed.). Pearson Higher Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.
