BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN TEACHERS’ BELIEFS AND CLASSROOM PRACTICES IN COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTANA

Authors

  • Ergashaliyeva Dilshoda Bahromjon qizi Master's Degree of the Applied linguistics and Tesol, New Uzbekistan University

Keywords:

Communicative Language Teaching, teachers’ beliefs, classroom practices, Uzbekistan, language education reform, communicative competence

Abstract

This article explores the discrepancy between English language teachers’ beliefs and their classroom practices in implementing Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Uzbekistan. Although teachers generally express positive attitudes toward the communicative approach, their actual classroom behavior often remains traditional and teacher-centered. The study discusses several factors that contribute to this gap, including insufficient methodological training, large class sizes, exam-oriented education, and cultural attitudes toward authority. It also highlights the need for better teacher preparation programs, institutional support, and assessment reform to encourage the practical use of communicative activities in language classrooms. The findings emphasize that bridging the gap between beliefs and practices is essential for the successful implementation of CLT and the improvement of students’ communicative competence in Uzbekistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, J. (1993). Is communicative language teaching a reality in the classroom? ELT Journal, 47(4), 323–328.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

Karavas-Doukas, E. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50(3), 187–198.

Li, D. (1998). It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677–703.

Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–249.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative Language Teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. In S. J. Savignon (Ed.), Interpreting communicative language teaching (pp. 1–28). Yale University Press.

Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Practical understandings. The Modern Language Journal, 83(4), 494–517.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-22

How to Cite

Ergashaliyeva Dilshoda Bahromjon qizi. (2025). BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN TEACHERS’ BELIEFS AND CLASSROOM PRACTICES IN COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTANA. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 15(10), 1073–1078. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/2173