ARTICLE: THE INTERCONNECTED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEUROPEDAGOGY AND EDUCATIONAL QUALITY: EFFECTIVE TEACHING BASED ON BRAIN FUNCTION

Authors

  • O’ktamova Shahrizoda Master's student, Samarkand State Pedagogical Institute

Keywords:

neuropedagogy, educational quality, brain function, effective teaching, neuroplasticity, executive function, attention, emotional engagement, individualized learning, brain-based education.

Abstract

This article explores the interconnected relationship between neuropedagogy and educational quality, emphasizing the role of brain function in effective teaching. Drawing on insights from neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and educational research, the study examines how neuroplasticity, attention, executive functions, and emotional engagement influence learning outcomes. The discussion highlights the importance of individualized and differentiated instruction, evidence-based teaching strategies, and technology-mediated learning environments. By integrating brain-based principles into pedagogy, educators can enhance student engagement, retention, and overall educational quality. The article concludes that neuropedagogy provides a scientifically grounded framework for improving teaching practices and fostering holistic development in learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bavelier, D., Green, C. S., & Dye, M. W. (2012). Learning, attentional control, and the brain: The role of interactive technologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 16–21.

Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332(6033), 1049–1053.

Chaddock, L., Hillman, C. H., & Kramer, A. F. (2011). Aerobic fitness and cognitive control in children: Neuroimaging perspectives. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 243–256.

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.

Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Viking.

Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–312.

Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325(5938), 280–283.

Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R., & Mangun, G. (2018). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (5th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Howard-Jones, P. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824.

Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

O’ktamova Shahrizoda. (2025). ARTICLE: THE INTERCONNECTED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEUROPEDAGOGY AND EDUCATIONAL QUALITY: EFFECTIVE TEACHING BASED ON BRAIN FUNCTION. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 15(12), 886–891. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/2735