INNOVATIVELY SHAPING TEACHERS' EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES USING DIGITAL PEDAGOGY
Keywords:
Digital pedagogy, innovative teaching strategies, TPACK, learner-centered education, educational technology, adaptive learning, teacher professional development, 21st-century skills.Abstract
This article explores the innovative transformation of teachers’ educational strategies through the integration of digital pedagogy. It examines how the thoughtful use of digital tools, aligned with pedagogical principles and content knowledge, can enhance student engagement, personalized learning, and the development of 21st-century skills. The study reviews theoretical frameworks such as TPACK, empirical research on adaptive and collaborative learning technologies, and practical insights from the recent shift to online and hybrid education models. Findings indicate that successful innovation depends not only on technological access but also on teachers’ beliefs, professional development, reflective practices, and institutional support. Challenges such as digital inequity, limited digital literacy, and superficial implementation are discussed, along with strategies to overcome them. The article concludes that a holistic, context-sensitive approach to digital pedagogy enables meaningful, learner-centered educational experiences and sustainable improvements in teaching quality.
Downloads
References
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.
Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2015). Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 16013.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2015). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2015). Digital literacy and digital competence in education: A review of frameworks and practices. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 1–13.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.
