THEORIES OF POLITENESS IN FOREIGN AND UZBEK LINGUISTICS

Authors

  • Djuraeva Go’zal Nuriddinovna Tashkent International University of Financial Management and Technology

Keywords:

politeness theory, pragmatics, face, Uzbek linguistics, intercultural communication.

Abstract

  Politeness is one of the central concepts in pragmatics and sociolinguistics, reflecting how language users manage social relationships and interpersonal harmony through linguistic choices. This article aims to provide a comparative analysis of politeness theories as developed in foreign linguistics and Uzbek linguistics. The methodology is based on qualitative analysis of theoretical sources and comparative interpretation. The results demonstrate both universal and culture-specific aspects of politeness, revealing that while foreign theories emphasize individual face and strategic language use, Uzbek linguistics highlights collectivism, respect for age and status, and culturally embedded norms. The discussion underscores the importance of integrating local linguistic traditions into global politeness research. The article concludes that politeness theories benefit from a cross-cultural perspective that accounts for both universal pragmatic principles and national-cultural specificity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rahmatullayev, Sh. (2010). Nutq madaniyati va uslubiyat masalalari. Tashkent.

Mahmudov, N. (2015). O‘zbek tilining pragmatik xususiyatlari. Tashkent.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

Djuraeva Go’zal Nuriddinovna. (2026). THEORIES OF POLITENESS IN FOREIGN AND UZBEK LINGUISTICS. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 16(01), 39–43. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/2881