MODERN APPROACHES TO EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION

Authors

  • Iminova Nargiza Bahodir kizi Department of 1-Obstetrics and Gynecology, Andijan State Medical Institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Fetal growth restriction, early diagnosis, Doppler ultrasonography, cerebroplacental ratio, PlGF, placental insufficiency.

Abstract

Background: Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) is a major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity, often linked to placental insufficiency. Differentiating pathological growth restriction from constitutionally small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses remains a clinical challenge. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal screening approach combining biometry, Doppler velocimetry, and biochemical markers for the early diagnosis of FGR. Methods: A prospective cohort study involving 300 pregnant women was conducted. Participants underwent screening at 11-13 weeks and 20-24 weeks. The protocol included: assessment of maternal risk factors, Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index (UtA-PI) measurement, Cerebroplacental Ratio (CPR) calculation, and serum PlGF levels. Diagnosis accuracy was compared against postnatal birth weight centiles and neonatal outcomes. Results: Traditional biometry alone had a sensitivity of 45% for predicting FGR. The combined model (Biometry + UtA-PI + CPR + PlGF) significantly increased sensitivity to 88% (p < 0.001) with a false-positive rate of 8%. Low PlGF levels (<5th percentile) and abnormal CPR were strong independent predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes, even in fetuses with estimated weight >10th percentile. Conclusion: A combined screening strategy significantly improves the early detection of FGR compared to biometry alone. Integrating hemodynamic (Doppler) and metabolic (PlGF) markers allows for the identification of "at-risk" fetuses before growth lag becomes anatomically apparent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gordijn, S. J., et al. (2016). Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 48(3), 333-339.

Sovio, U., et al. (2015). Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography. The Lancet, 386(10008), 2089-2097.

Baschat, A. A. (2018). Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 49, 53-65.

Poon, L. C., et al. (2016). Combined screening for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction by maternal factors, MAP, uterine artery Doppler, PAPP-A and PlGF at 11–13 weeks. Prenatal Diagnosis, 36(11).

Morales-Roselló, J., & Khalil, A. (2014). Fetal cerebroplacental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-08

How to Cite

Iminova Nargiza Bahodir kizi. (2025). MODERN APPROACHES TO EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 15(11), 929–934. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/2904