IMPROVING TEACHING METHODS IN APPLIED ARTS BASED ON CREATIVE EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UZBEKISTAN'S APPLIED ARTS SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Kamilova Lyubov Akhmadovna BukhSU, Department of Arts and Pedagogy Master’s degree

Keywords:

applied arts education, creative educational technologies, project-based learning, Uzbekistan crafts, digital art education, traditional arts preservation, teaching methodology innovation

Abstract

This study investigates the integration of creative educational technologies into applied arts education, with particular focus on Uzbekistan's traditional craft schools and institutions. The research employs a mixed-methods approach combining systematic literature review, secondary data analysis, and comparative assessment to examine the effectiveness of technology-enhanced teaching methodologies in preserving and advancing traditional artistic practices. Findings indicate that project-based learning approaches demonstrate significant improvements in student engagement and creative outcomes, with meta-analyses revealing effect sizes ranging from 0.52 to 0.68. The study finds that 63.8% of students engaged in arts education demonstrate higher academic performance than 43.7% of non-arts students. Furthermore, the integration of digital technologies such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence has shown promising results in enhancing spatial understanding, fostering creative thinking, and bridging digital content with physical artistic traditions. The analysis reveals unique challenges and opportunities specific to Uzbekistan's applied arts education system, including preserving centuries-old master-apprentice traditions while integrating modern pedagogical approaches. Recommendations are provided for educational institutions, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to optimise teaching effectiveness in applied arts education while maintaining cultural authenticity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Ashton, K., & Ashton, T. (2023). Educational inequalities in access to arts education in England. British Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 276-293.

Baber, R., & Baber, P. (2023). Influence of social media marketing on destination image and travel intention. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 54, 120-132.

Boardman, A. G., Polman, J. L., & Scornavacco, K. (2024). Examining enactments of project-based learning in secondary English language arts. AERA Open, 10(1), 1-18.

Bowen, D. H., & Kisida, B. (2023). The causal impact of arts education on student outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 45(1), 42-61.

Bowen, D. H., & Kisida, B. (2024). Arts education in Boston public schools: Effects on engagement and achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 19(2), 234-258.

Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 26, 71-81.

Chiu, M. C., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence-supported art education: A deep learning-based system for promoting university students' artwork appreciation. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(3), 824-842.

Garcia, A. M., & Dalton, B. (2023). Project-based learning in digital environments: Implications for arts education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(4), 512-529.

Grájeda, A., et al. (2024). Emotional responses to AI-enhanced versus traditional art classes. Computers & Education, 210, 104952.

Halimi, M., et al. (2021). The relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement in arts education contexts. Arts Education Policy Review, 122(3), 178-192.

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570.

Jing, Y., & Omar, J. (2024). Integrating digital tools in art education: A study of TPACK development in Chinese pre-service teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 760-767.

Khakimov, A. (2008). Art education in Uzbekistan. In L. Joubert (Ed.), Educating in the arts: The Asian experience (pp. 171-186). Springer.

Li, X., et al. (2021). Challenges in arts education during COVID-19: A hybrid learning model analysis. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40(3), 567-582.

Mota, F. B., Cabral, B. P., Braga, L. A. M., & Lopes, R. M. (2025). Mapping the global research on project-based learning: A bibliometric and network analysis (2014-2024). Frontiers in Education, 10, 1522694.

Nachouki, M., et al. (2023). Impact of educational technology integration on academic performance in arts disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1823-1845.

National Endowment for the Arts. (2024). Arts education in U.S. public schools: Insights from the November 2024 School Pulse Panel Survey. Washington, DC: NEA.

Perales, F., & Aróstegui, J. L. (2024). The STEAM movement: Balancing arts and sciences in education. International Journal of Education Through Art, 20(1), 45-62.

Qi, B., Zhong, H., & Cai, L. (2025). Transforming art design education through information technology. ScienceDirect, Education Series.

Ramasamy, R., Singh, G. K. S., & Singh, R. K. P. G. (2024). The role of digital technology in fostering creativity and critical thinking in Chinese art education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 1196-1224.

Rodriguez-Sanchez, M., et al. (2024). Social constructivism in project-based learning: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 1-42.

SRI Education. (2022). Creativity challenge: The state of arts education in California. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

The Art of Education University. (2023). The state of art education 2023. Annual survey report.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.

Ülger, K. (2016). The relationship between creative thinking and critical thinking skills of students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 31(4), 695-710.

UNESCO. (2017). Safeguarding practices for traditional silk weaving in Uzbekistan. Intangible Cultural Heritage Section.

Uzbekistan Art and Culture Development Foundation. (2024). Naqsh School of Crafts: Partnership with The King's Foundation School of Traditional Arts. Tashkent: ACDF.

Vartiainen, H., & Tedre, M. (2023). Using artificial intelligence in craft education: Crafting with text-to-image generative models. Digital Creativity, 34(1), 1-21.

Yu, H., et al. (2024). Enhancing creative cognition through project-based learning: An in-depth scholarly exploration. Heliyon, 10(3), e24567.

Zhou, C. (2023). Integration of modern technologies in higher education on the example of artificial intelligence use. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 3893-3910.

Zhu, C., et al. (2025). The use of deep learning and artificial intelligence-based digital technologies in art education. Scientific Reports, 15, 00892.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Kamilova Lyubov Akhmadovna. (2026). IMPROVING TEACHING METHODS IN APPLIED ARTS BASED ON CREATIVE EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UZBEKISTAN’S APPLIED ARTS SCHOOLS. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 16(02), 117–131. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/3168