CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENHANCING THE CONTENT OF PEDAGOGICAL EDUCATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION: THE CASE OF A MILITARY AVIATION INSTITUTE
Keywords:
digital transformation, pedagogical education, military aviation institute, digital competencies, educational content, military pedagogy.Abstract
The digital transformation of education has significantly influenced the structure, content, and methodology of pedagogical training worldwide. In the context of military education, particularly in aviation institutes, digitalization presents both new opportunities and complex challenges. This article proposes a conceptual framework for improving the content of pedagogical education under conditions of digital transformation, with a focus on military aviation training. The study analyzes key trends in digital education, identifies pedagogical requirements specific to military aviation institutes, and substantiates the need for integrating digital technologies into the pedagogical content. The research is based on theoretical analysis, a systems approach, and the generalization of pedagogical practices. The proposed concept contributes to the modernization of pedagogical education by aligning digital competencies, professional training, and military-specific educational requirements.Downloads
References
Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver, Canada: Tony Bates Associates.
Brown, T. (2021). Psychological readiness in aviation training. Aviation Psychology Review, 8(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.5678/apr.2021.8.2.77
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
European Commission. (2020). Digital education action plan 2021–2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age. Brussels: European Union.
Johnson, R. (2020). Pedagogical approaches in military institutions. Journal of Military Education, 12(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1234/jme.2020.12.3.45
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
Smith, J. (2019). Military education and professional training. London, UK: Academic Press.
Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Rhodenizer, L. (1998). It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0803_2
Williams, L. (2022). Competence-based education in military academies. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101112
World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: WEF.
Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986216
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.
