ARTISTIC AND LOGICAL GRADATION OF HUMAN SPIRITUAL ASCENT A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEBATE BETWEEN FARHAD AND XUSROW

Authors

  • Nilufar R. Maxmudova Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Philology, Associate Professor Andijan State Institute of Foreign Languages Andijan, Republic of Uzbekistan

Keywords:

gradation, anthropocentrism, spiritual ascent, hierarchy of values, philosophy of love, poetics of debate

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the artistic and logical gradational model of human spiritual ascent based on the debate episode between Farhad and Khosrow in Farhod va Shirin by Alisher Navoi and Xusrav va Shirin by Nizami Ganjavi.
The study argues that this episode is not merely a romantic rivalry, but a philosophical construct revealing a hierarchy of values. In Navoi’s interpretation, gradation rises from emotional dramatism to a consciously structured ethical system, which is demonstrated through scholarly analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nizami Ganjavi. Khosrow and Shirin. Tashkent: Gafur Ghulam Publishing House, 1982, pp. 185–188.

Alisher Navoi. Farhod va Shirin. Complete Works, Vol. 8. Tashkent: Fan, 1991, pp. 342–345.

Bertels, E.E. Navoi and Nizami. Moscow: Nauka, 1948, pp. 78–82.

Hayitmetov, A. Problems of Navoi’s Creative Method. Tashkent: Fan, 1970, pp. 112–118.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-05

How to Cite

Nilufar R. Maxmudova. (2026). ARTISTIC AND LOGICAL GRADATION OF HUMAN SPIRITUAL ASCENT A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEBATE BETWEEN FARHAD AND XUSROW. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 16(02), 1661–1662. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/3573