ARTISTIC AND LOGICAL GRADATION OF HUMAN SPIRITUAL ASCENT A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEBATE BETWEEN FARHAD AND XUSROW
Keywords:
gradation, anthropocentrism, spiritual ascent, hierarchy of values, philosophy of love, poetics of debateAbstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of the artistic and logical gradational model of human spiritual ascent based on the debate episode between Farhad and Khosrow in Farhod va Shirin by Alisher Navoi and Xusrav va Shirin by Nizami Ganjavi.
The study argues that this episode is not merely a romantic rivalry, but a philosophical construct revealing a hierarchy of values. In Navoi’s interpretation, gradation rises from emotional dramatism to a consciously structured ethical system, which is demonstrated through scholarly analysis.
Downloads
References
Nizami Ganjavi. Khosrow and Shirin. Tashkent: Gafur Ghulam Publishing House, 1982, pp. 185–188.
Alisher Navoi. Farhod va Shirin. Complete Works, Vol. 8. Tashkent: Fan, 1991, pp. 342–345.
Bertels, E.E. Navoi and Nizami. Moscow: Nauka, 1948, pp. 78–82.
Hayitmetov, A. Problems of Navoi’s Creative Method. Tashkent: Fan, 1970, pp. 112–118.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.