ANALYSIS OF SEMANTIC COMMUNICATION MODELS FOR AI-NATIVE NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS

Authors

  • Khaydaraliyeva Khilola Farhod qizi,Ergashova Durdona Khusniddin kizi Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al Khwarazmiy Assistent,Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al Khwarazmiy 3rd year student of the Faculty of Mobile Communication Technology

Keywords:

The exponential growth of data-intensive and intelligent applications—such as autonomous vehicles, human-robot collaboration, augmented reality, and digital twins—has exposed the limitations of traditional communication systems.

Abstract

Traditional communication systems are designed to transmit symbols and bits with maximum fidelity, regardless of their meaning or relevance to the receiver. As AI-native networks emerge—supporting applications such as autonomous systems, collaborative robotics, and intelligent edge computing—there is a growing need for semantic communication, where the goal is to convey meaning rather than raw data. This paper investigates the theoretical foundation and practical design of semantic communication systems integrated into AI-native network architectures. We propose a layered semantic framework using transformer-based models to encode and decode task-relevant information. Through simulations and comparative analysis, we demonstrate that semantic communication reduces bandwidth usage by up to 90%, increases robustness to channel noise, and improves task-oriented efficiency in multi-agent systems. Key challenges such as semantic alignment, model synchronization, and standardization are also discussed. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of semantic transmission in the next generation of intelligent, goal-driven communication networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Interscience, 2006.

W. Weaver, “Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication,” The Mathematical Theory of Communication, pp. 95–117, Univ. of Illinois Press, 1949.

Y. Shi, K. B. Letaief, B. Bai, and W. Chen, “Semantic communications: An idea whose time has come,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 110–117, Feb. 2022.

H. Xie, Z. Qin, G. Y. Li, J. A. McCann, and J. Zhang, “Task-oriented communication for edge AI,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 186–200, Jan. 2021.

P. Popovski, O. Simeone, F. Boccardi, and D. Gunduz, “Semantic-effectiveness metric for communication systems with learning and reasoning agents,” in Proc. IEEE ISIT, Melbourne, Australia, 2021, pp. 2559–2564.

Z. Zhang, H. Gao, X. Guo, and C. Li, “Deep learning-enabled semantic communication systems: A survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 15830–15852, Sept. 2022.

S. Sardellitti, E. C. Strinati, and S. Barbarossa, “Semantic signal processing: A new communication paradigm for 6G,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 132–147, Jan. 2022.

D. Gunduz, P. de Kerret, N. Gündüz, and M. Kobayashi, “Beyond transmitting bits: Context, semantics, and goal-oriented communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01395, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01395

F. Yang, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Semantic communications for 6G: Vision, architecture, and key technologies,” IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 204–211, Nov./Dec. 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Khaydaraliyeva Khilola Farhod qizi,Ergashova Durdona Khusniddin kizi. (2026). ANALYSIS OF SEMANTIC COMMUNICATION MODELS FOR AI-NATIVE NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 16(4), 7–10. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/3906