STUDENTS SHOULD USE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION OR RELY ON TRADITIONAL LEARNING

Authors

  • Abdullaeva Shahzodakhon Ulugbek kizi, Nurullaeva Mushtariy Rahim kizi Hamid Olimjon and Zufiya Creative school,

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence in education, traditional learning, classroom observation, student independence, critical thinking, digital literacy, learning strategies, academic integrity, personalized learning, cognitive development

Abstract

 This article examines whether students should use Artificial Intelligence in education or rely primarily on traditional learning, based on systematic classroom observations conducted by the author. By closely monitoring students’ learning behaviors, task completion patterns, and engagement levels, the study explores how AI tools influence understanding, creativity, independence, and critical thinking. The paper compares AI-supported learning with conventional methods such as textbooks, note-taking, and face-to-face discussion. Observations reveal that while AI increases access to information, speeds up task performance, and supports personalized learning, it can also reduce deep thinking and originality when overused. The article highlights the importance of balanced integration, where AI serves as a supportive assistant rather than a replacement for cognitive effort. Practical classroom examples demonstrate how guided AI use can enhance learning outcomes without undermining fundamental academic skills. The study concludes that the most effective educational approach combines the strengths of AI technologies with the proven benefits of traditional learning practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). AI in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. OECD Publishing.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing.

Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

Downloads

Published

2026-04-04

How to Cite

Abdullaeva Shahzodakhon Ulugbek kizi, Nurullaeva Mushtariy Rahim kizi. (2026). STUDENTS SHOULD USE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION OR RELY ON TRADITIONAL LEARNING. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 16(4), 100–103. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/3928