METHODS FOR DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING IN STUDENTS
Keywords:
critical thinking, problem-based learning, inquiry-based learning, collaborative learning, educational technology, higher-order thinking, formative assessment, student-centered learning, teaching strategies, cognitive skills.Abstract
This article explores effective methods for developing critical thinking in students within contemporary educational contexts. Drawing on recent literature and research findings, the study examines the impact of problem-based learning, inquiry-based instruction, collaborative approaches, and technology-enhanced environments on students’ higher-order thinking skills. The findings indicate that integrating active learning strategies with formative assessment and supportive teaching practices significantly enhances students’ ability to analyze, evaluate, and solve complex problems. Additionally, the study highlights the crucial role of teachers, classroom environment, and cultural context in shaping critical thinking development. Despite certain challenges, such as resource limitations and varying student readiness, the research underscores the importance of adopting student-centered approaches to prepare learners for the demands of the modern world.
Downloads
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, A. C., & Persson, T. (2022). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(2), 245–281.
Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2023). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Routledge.
Belland, B. R., Kim, N. J., & Hannafin, M. J. (2021). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 123–142.
Brookhart, S. M. (2021). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2023). The role of collaboration in fostering critical thinking in online discussions. Computers & Education, 194, 104703.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2021). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 25(2), 97–140.
Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2021). The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kimmons, R., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2022). The importance of educational technology integration for critical thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 1–15.
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2022). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 92(5), 764–804.
Li, L., & Wegerif, R. (2022). What does it mean to teach thinking in different cultures? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101039.
Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2022). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner (3rd ed.). Corwin.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.
