THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS ON EFL STUDENTS' WRITING PERFORMANCE AND MOTIVATION
Keywords:
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, EFL learners, writing performance, motivation, language learning, ChatGPT, Grammarly, educational technology, writing skills, AI-assisted learning.Abstract
Abstract. The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has significantly transformed educational practices worldwide, particularly in the field of language learning. AI-powered tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot, and other intelligent writing assistants have become increasingly popular among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. These tools provide real-time feedback, grammar correction, vocabulary enhancement, and writing suggestions that can improve students' writing skills and learning experiences. This study investigates the impact of AI tools on EFL students' writing performance and motivation. Through a review of recent literature and theoretical perspectives, the research examines how AI-assisted writing environments influence writing quality, learner autonomy, engagement, and motivation. The findings indicate that AI tools contribute positively to writing development by improving grammatical accuracy, vocabulary use, coherence, and organization. Furthermore, they enhance learners' confidence and motivation by providing immediate support and personalized feedback. However, concerns regarding overreliance on technology, academic integrity, and reduced critical thinking skills remain significant challenges. The study concludes that AI tools can serve as valuable educational resources when integrated appropriately into EFL writing instruction.
Downloads
References
Ferris, D. R. (2018). Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. University of Michigan Press.
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and Second Language Acquisition. Peter Lang Publishing.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Emerging technologies: Generative AI and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 4–16.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promise and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550.
Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2022). AI-assisted writing tools in second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1–20.
Ranalli, J. (2021). Automated written corrective feedback and second language writing. Language Teaching Research, 25(4), 560–578.
Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2019). Automated feedback and EFL writing development. System, 81, 21–33.
Wang, Y., & Young, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language learning: A review. Computers & Education, 182, 104448.
Xiao, L., & Zhi, R. (2024). ChatGPT and learner motivation in EFL writing classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 115–134.
Zhang, X., & Hyland, K. (2022). Writing instruction and feedback in digital environments. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100936.
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating? Academic integrity in the age of generative AI. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(1), 1–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content published in the Journal of Applied Science and Social Science (JASSS) is protected by copyright. Authors retain the copyright to their work, and grant JASSS the right to publish the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as they credit the author(s) for the original creation.
