STUDY METHODS BETWEEN UZBEK AND AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES

Authors

  • Shamsiddinova Dilafruz, Mamedova Guzalya Supervisor,Student Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Philology and Teaching languages (English) 2-course.

Keywords:

Higher education, study methods, teaching approaches, assessment systems, course flexibility, student-professor relationships, Uzbekistan, United States, interactive learning, critical thinking academic adaptation, American universities.

Abstract

Higher education systems vary across countries, influenced by cultural, historical, and economic factors. This article examines the differences and similarities in study methods between universities in Uzbekistan and the United States, focusing on teaching approaches, assessment systems, assignments, course flexibility, and student-professor relationships. Uzbek universities rely on a structured, lecture-based system where students primarily memorize theoretical knowledge and follow a fixed curriculum. Assessment methods are mainly written and oral exams, with limited student participation in class discussions. In contrast, American universities emphasize interactive learning, critical thinking, and independent research. Students are encouraged to engage in discussions, analyze real-world problems, and apply their knowledge through essays, presentations, and projects. Additionally, American universities offer greater flexibility in course selection, allowing students to explore different disciplines. Another  key difference lies in student-professor relationships: Uzbek students maintain a formal dynamic, while American students are encouraged to communicate openly with professors, fostering mentorship opportunities. By understanding these distinctions, students can better adapt to different educational environments and improve their academic experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Commission. (2015). ECTS users’ guide. https://ec.europa.eu/education/ects/users-guide/docs/ects-users-guide_en.pdf

European Commission. (2009). ECTS users’ guide. https://ec.europa.eu/education/ects/users-guide/docs/year-2009/ects-users-guide-2009_en.pdf

European Commission. (2004). ECTS users’ guide. https://www.uc.pt/ae3s/pasta_docs/ects-users-guide-70804.pdf

Lutfullayev, P. (2019). About credit-module training system. Namangan.

Shedd, J. (2023). The history of the student credit hour. New Directions for Higher Education, 122, 5-12.

The Council and the Ministers of Education. (1976). Official Journal of the European Communities.

Urinov, V. (2020). ECTS credit-module system in higher education institutions of the Republic of Uzbekistan: Basic concepts and rules. Tashkent.

Wagenaar, R. (2020). A history of ECTS, 1989-2019: Developing a world standard for credit transfer and accumulation in higher education. International Tuning Academy. https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/111591811/A_History_of_ECTS_1989_2019_PDF.pdf

Ziyonet. (n.d.). Educational resources. www.ziyonet.uz

Referat. (n.d.). Academic papers database. www.referat.uz

Arxiv. (n.d.). Research repository. www.arxiv.uz

Downloads

Published

2025-03-05

How to Cite

Shamsiddinova Dilafruz, Mamedova Guzalya. (2025). STUDY METHODS BETWEEN UZBEK AND AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 15(03), 178–187. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/734