In Journal of Applied Science and Social Science double-blind peer-review process has been followed since 2011. After the initial green signal by the editor, the papers are sent to suitable reviewers. The article may be sent to more than 2 or more reviewers. Average time from submission to a final decision: 25-30 days
Double-Blind Peer Review – The Definition
In the Double-blind peer review, the identity of both the author and reviewer is kept secret. This mainly stops the reviewer from forming any partiality as the reviewer doesn’t know who wrote the article.
To aid this the authors need to make sure that their manuscripts are created in a way that doesn’t reveal their identity at any cost.
But as no process is entirely useful or harmful, the Double-Blind Peer Review also comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Let’s now discuss them in detail.
Advantages of Double-Blind Peer Review System
More than 75% of academics all over the world have confidence in a double-blind review system.
Double-Blind Peer Review System gives pure and unbiased results.
Empowers female authors.
Journal of Applied Science and Social Science is international, evaluated by experts of the journal which publishes high-quality, unique research contributions toward scientific knowledge. Every manuscript submissions are the focus of an initial assessment by the Editor, as well as if found appropriate for more reflection, peer review by independent, anonymous proficient referees. Every peer review is double-blind as well as the submission is online by the use of ScholarOne Manuscripts.
The peer review process for Journal of Applied Science and Social Science typically involves the following steps:
Submission: The author submits a manuscript to the journal. The manuscript should include original research or a review of the existing literature on a specific topic.
Editorial screening: The editor-in-chief or associate editor screens the manuscript to ensure that it meets the journal's requirements, such as adhering to the journal's scope and format guidelines.
Peer review: The editor sends the manuscript to two or more expert reviewers in the field. These reviewers are typically selected based on their expertise and experience in the topic of the manuscript. They review the manuscript and provide feedback on the quality, validity, and relevance of the research.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewers provide feedback to the editor on the manuscript, which includes their comments, suggestions for improvement, and a recommendation for acceptance, rejection, or revision.
Author response: The author receives the feedback from the reviewers and responds to their comments and suggestions. The author may revise the manuscript based on the feedback and resubmit it to the journal.
Editorial decision: The editor evaluates the manuscript, the reviewers' feedback, and the author's response, and makes a decision on whether to accept, reject, or ask for revisions to the manuscript.
Publication: If the manuscript is accepted, it undergoes copyediting and formatting to ensure that it meets the journal's standards. It is then published online and may appear in a print edition of the journal as well.